[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6d22274-b433-4757-a36b-40211bbe5c84@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:17:24 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] tty: msm_serial: use dmaengine_prep_slave_sg()
On 17. 04. 24, 14:45, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 17.04.2024 12:50, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 17. 04. 24, 12:15, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> On 16.04.2024 12:23, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>> On 15. 04. 24, 23:17, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>>> On 05.04.2024 08:08, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote:
>>>>>> This is a preparatory for the serial-to-kfifo switch. kfifo
>>>>>> understands
>>>>>> only scatter-gatter approach, so switch to that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No functional change intended, it's just
>>>>>> dmaengine_prep_slave_single()
>>>>>> inline expanded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And in this case, switch from dma_map_single() to dma_map_sg() too.
>>>>>> This
>>>>>> needs struct msm_dma changes. I split the rx and tx parts into an
>>>>>> union.
>>>>>> TX is now struct scatterlist, RX remains the old good phys-virt-count
>>>>>> triple.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@...nel.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
>>>>>> Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just found that this patch broke UART operation on DragonBoard
>>>>> 410c. I briefly checked and didn't notice anything obviously wrong
>>>>> here,
>>>>> but the board stops transmitting any data from its serial port
>>>>> after the
>>>>> first message. I will try to analyze this issue a bit more tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> I double checked, but I see no immediate issues in the patch too. So
>>>> please, if you can analyze this more…
>>>
>>> I've spent some time digging into this issue and frankly speaking I
>>> still have no idea WHY it doesn't work (or I seriously mixed something
>>> in the scatterlist principles). However I found a workaround to make it
>>> working. Maybe it will help a bit guessing what happens there.
>> ...
>>> @@ -434,7 +436,7 @@ static void msm_start_tx(struct uart_port *port)
>>> struct msm_dma *dma = &msm_port->tx_dma;
>>>
>>> /* Already started in DMA mode */
>>> - if (sg_dma_len(&dma->tx_sg))
>>> + if (dma->mapped)
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this.
>>
>> I was hesitant if I should use a flag. I should have, apparently.
>>
>> Quick question:
>> What's value of CONFIG_NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH in your .config?
>
>
> CONFIG_NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH=y
>
>
> I alse tried to change the "if (dma->mapped)" check in msm_start_tx() to:
>
> 1. if (dma->tx_sg.length)
>
> 2. if (dma->tx_sg.page_link & ~SG_PAGE_LINK_MASK)
>
> but none of the above worked what is really strange and incomprehensible
> for me.
Thanks. Neither for me. Could you add:
{
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs,
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
if (dma->mapped != !!sg_dma_len(&dma->tx_sg) &&
__ratelimit(&rs))
printk_deferred(KERN_DEBUG "%s (%d): mapped=%u
dma_len=%u\n",
__func__, __LINE__,
dma->mapped, sg_dma_len(&dma->tx_sg));
}
before each of your 'if (dma->mapped)' to see where sg_dma_len() is
wrong and what is its value in the bad case. I hope I did the logic right.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists