[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5febb249-1d4d-4ea7-b031-1df4d14620d2@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:09:09 +0530
From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
George Kennedy <george.kennedy@...cle.com>,
Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>, chuansheng.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [bug-report] task info hung problem in fb_deferred_io_work()
Hi Takashi,
On 19/04/24 12:14, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 21:29:57 +0200,
> Helge Deller wrote:
>>
>> On 4/18/24 16:26, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:06:52 +0200,
>>> Nam Cao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-04-18 Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
>>>>> While fuzzing 5.15.y kernel with Syzkaller, we noticed a INFO: task hung
>>>>> bug in fb_deferred_io_work()
>>>>
>>>> Which framebuffer device are you using exactly? It is possible that
>>>> the problem is with the device driver, not core framebuffer.
>>>
>>> Note that it was already known that using flush_delayed_work() caused
>>> a problem. See the thread of the fix patch:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230129082856.22113-1-tiwai@suse.de/
>>
>> Harshit reported the hung tasks with kernel v5.15-stable, and can even reproduce
>> that issue with kernel v6.9-rc4 although it has all of your patches from
>> that referenced mail thread applied.
>> So, what does your statement that "it was already known that it causes problems" exactly mean?
>> Can it be fixed? Is someone looking into fixing it?
>
> My original fix was intentionally with cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> because flush_delayed_work() didn't work. We knew that it'd miss some
> last-minute queued change, but it's better than crash, so it was
> applied in that way.
>
Thanks for sharing these details.
> Then later on, the commit 33cd6ea9c067 changed cancel_*() to
> flush_delayed_work() blindly, and the known problem resurfaced again.
>
I have reverted that commit, but still could see some other task hung
message as shared here on other reply:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/d2485cb9-277d-4b8e-9794-02f1efababc9@oracle.com/
Thanks,
Harshit
>
> Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists