[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AS8PR05MB9810C02BC1C3F3E301B8A590830D2@AS8PR05MB9810.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:05:15 +0000
From: Maarten Brock <Maarten.Brock@...ls.nl>
To: Konstantin Pugin <rilian.la.te@...ru>
CC: Konstantin Pugin <ria.freelander@...il.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Hugo
Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Lech Perczak
<lech.perczak@...lingroup.com>, Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/3] add support for EXAR XR20M1172 UART
> From: Konstantin Pugin <rilian.la.te@...ru>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] add support for EXAR XR20M1172 UART
What is the policy in the kernel sources for the name of the manufacturer?
This driver never had special support for the EXAR chips when it was still EXAR.
Since 2017 it is now part of MaxLinear. Should the driver use the name of the
original manufacturer or the name of the manufacturer at the time of addition
to the sources?
Kind regards,
Maarten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists