[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240419101643.11534-1-hailong.liu@oppo.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:16:43 +0800
From: <hailong.liu@...o.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <urezki@...il.com>, <hch@...radead.org>, <lstoakes@...il.com>,
<21cnbao@...il.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hailong.Liu <hailong.liu@...o.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: fix return value of vb_alloc if size is 0.
From: "Hailong.Liu" <hailong.liu@...o.com>
vm_map_ram check return value of vb_alloc by IS_ERR. if
vm_map_ram(page, 0, 0) , vb_alloc(0, GFP_KERNEL) would return NULL
which cause kernel panic by vmap_pages_range_noflush。fix this by
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if size is 0.
Signed-off-by: Hailong.Liu <hailong.liu@...o.com>
---
Changes since v1 [1]:
- Return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) or not check IS_ERR_OR_NULL
BTW, Barry suggests me that if count is 0, return directly, in my
opinion, change return value is more resonable.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/84d7cd03-1cf8-401a-8edf-2524db0bd6d5@oppo.com/
mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index a3fedb3ee0db..c430a999805b 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2173,7 +2173,7 @@ static void *vb_alloc(unsigned long size, gfp_t gfp_mask)
* get_order(0) returns funny result. Just warn and terminate
* early.
*/
- return NULL;
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
order = get_order(size);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists