[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd505cc611db537c1ecfab8a35e43ba9e1e28171.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:45:48 -0400
From: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Nilesh Javali
<njavali@...vell.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: Use -EIO in qla_get_tmf()
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:24:56 +0200
>
> Add a minus sign before the error code “EIO”
> so that a negative value will eventually be returned
> as in another error case.
No it won't. If you look how it's used the consumer doesn't pass on
the error.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists