[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9r8+ULD74ehz-LOpuAXb57BDFCD9Gr3Aw-JPJfTLC5OCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:02:01 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: robh@...nel.org
Cc: tytso@....edu, krzk@...nel.org, "Landge, Sudan" <sudanl@...zon.co.uk>,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sudanl@...zon.com, graf@...zon.com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, xmarcalx@...zon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] virt: vmgenid: add support for devicetree bindings
Hi Rob,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 3:30 PM Landge, Sudan <sudanl@...zon.co.uk> wrote:
> > config VMGENID
> > tristate "Virtual Machine Generation ID driver"
> > default y
> > - depends on ACPI
> > + depends on ACPI || OF
>
> Version 2 of the patches had these flag but were removed in version3
> following the below review comment from Rob:
> "One of those is pretty much always enabled, so it can probably be dropped."
> reference :
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAL_JsqJoB5CYajWuntMdQrJZir+ZA-69Q0cwvxcVZAqs-mXC+Q@mail.gmail.com/
Are you sure about that? I see other drivers that depend on `ACPI ||
OF`, and this driver is totally useless without either disabled
(right?), so the dependency makes sense. I think? Not an expert in
this area, so I'm happy to defer to what you know is best, but I did
want to lightly pushback a bit.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists