lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240419150033.GBZiKHEUVzwz1LUDS5@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:00:33 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpu: Ignore "mitigations" kernel parameter if
 CPU_MITIGATIONS=n

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 05:15:07PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Explicitly disallow enabling mitigations at runtime for kernels that were
> built with CONFIG_CPU_MITIGATIONS=n, which currently is possible only on
> x86 (via x86's SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS menuconfig).

Hm, so the umbrella term is CPU_MITIGATIONS, the x86-one is
SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS.

I wanna streamline our namespacing and say, the arch agnostic term
should be CPU_MITIGATIONS and the x86 one should be then
X86_CPU_MITIGATIONS, the Arm one would be ARM_CPU_MITIGATIONS and so on.

This way we can stick all kinds of special mitigations code - not only
speculative execution ones - under those config items and have it all
straight from the get-go.

And I think we should do it now, before it all propagates down the tree
and becomes a lot harder to rename.

Thoughts?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ