lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16a47cb9-a567-482a-a875-9070ce9973bf@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:16:42 +0100
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
 Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/16] thermal: gov_user_space: Use .trip_crossed()
 instead of .throttle()



On 4/10/24 18:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Notifying user space about trip points that have not been crossed is
> not particuarly useful, so modity the User Space governor to use the

s/particuarly/particularly/

s/modity/modify/

> .trip_crossed() callback, which is only invoked for trips that have been
> crossed, instead of .throttle() that is invoked for all trips in a
> thermal zone every time the zone is updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> 
> Note: I am not actually sure if there is user space depending on the
> current behavior that can be broken by this change.
> 
> I can easily imagine trying to implement a complicated governor in user
> space that will look at all of the trips in the thermal zone regardless
> of whether or not they are crossed, which can be kind of helped by the
> current behavior of the user space governor.
> 
> However, the total overhead caused by it is considerable and quite
> arguably it may not be acceptable at least in some cases.

If there is a such user space governor - it should not rely on
notifications from each trip. It should rather read from sysfs
the list of all trips during setup and just act on those which
have been crossed in runtime, IMO.

Therefore, I agree with the proposed change.

> 
> ---
>   drivers/thermal/gov_user_space.c |   10 +++++-----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/gov_user_space.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/gov_user_space.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/gov_user_space.c
> @@ -26,11 +26,13 @@ static int user_space_bind(struct therma
>    * notify_user_space - Notifies user space about thermal events
>    * @tz: thermal_zone_device
>    * @trip: trip point
> + * @crossed_up: whether or not the trip has been crossed on the way up
>    *
>    * This function notifies the user space through UEvents.
>    */
> -static int notify_user_space(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> -			     const struct thermal_trip *trip)
> +static void notify_user_space(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> +			      const struct thermal_trip *trip,
> +			      bool crossed_up)
>   {
>   	char *thermal_prop[5];
>   	int i;
> @@ -46,13 +48,11 @@ static int notify_user_space(struct ther
>   	kobject_uevent_env(&tz->device.kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE, thermal_prop);
>   	for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
>   		kfree(thermal_prop[i]);
> -
> -	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   static struct thermal_governor thermal_gov_user_space = {
>   	.name		= "user_space",
> -	.throttle	= notify_user_space,
> +	.trip_crossed	= notify_user_space,
>   	.bind_to_tz	= user_space_bind,
>   };
>   THERMAL_GOVERNOR_DECLARE(thermal_gov_user_space);
> 
> 
> 

LGTM w/ the spelling fixes applied

Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ