[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ8fhKUwK_m8uGfvBUBrAdXdMYM3_AA5zo2cQzhW3jE1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:31:44 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
andrii@...nel.org, olsajiri@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] kbuild: Avoid weak external linkage where possible
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:57 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 16:40, <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello:
> >
> > This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
> > by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:20:42 +0200 you wrote:
> > > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > Weak external linkage is intended for cases where a symbol reference
> > > can remain unsatisfied in the final link. Taking the address of such a
> > > symbol should yield NULL if the reference was not satisfied.
> > >
> > > Given that ordinary RIP or PC relative references cannot produce NULL,
> > > some kind of indirection is always needed in such cases, and in position
> > > independent code, this results in a GOT entry. In ordinary code, it is
> > > arch specific but amounts to the same thing.
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Here is the summary with links:
> > - [v4,1/3] kallsyms: Avoid weak references for kallsyms symbols
> > (no matching commit)
> > - [v4,2/3] vmlinux: Avoid weak reference to notes section
> > (no matching commit)
> > - [v4,3/3] btf: Avoid weak external references
> > https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fc5eb4a84e4c
> >
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Masahiro, could you pick up patches #1 and #2 please?
>
I do not like PROVIDE() because it potentially shifts
a build error (i.e. link error) into
a run-time error, which is usually more difficult to debug
than build error.
If someone references the kallsyms_* symbols
when CONFIG_KALLSYMS=n, it is likely a mistake.
In general, it should be reported as a link error.
With PROVIDE() added, we will never detect it
at a build time.
Do you want me to pick up 1/3?
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists