[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5cd2bf8a6f2e12d5e3cb6bf68ccdaf8.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:48:08 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, David Collins <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/7] spmi: pmic-arb: Register controller for bus instead of arbiter
Quoting Abel Vesa (2024-04-17 13:00:58)
> Introduce the bus object in order to decouple the resources
> that are bus specific from the arbiter. This way the SPMI controller
> is registered with the generic framework at a bus level rather than
> arbiter. This is needed in order to prepare for multi bus support.
>
> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> ---
Applied to spmi-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists