[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240420051547.3681642-5-dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 13:15:44 +0800
From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
andreas@...sler.com
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sam@...nborg.org,
Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] sparc/pci_msi: Remove on-stack cpumask var
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
@cpumask of irq_set_affinity() is read-only and free of change, drop
unneeded cpumask var.
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
---
arch/sparc/kernel/pci_msi.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_msi.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_msi.c
index fc7402948b7b..acb2f83a1d5c 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_msi.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_msi.c
@@ -287,10 +287,7 @@ static int bringup_one_msi_queue(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
nid = pbm->numa_node;
if (nid != -1) {
- cpumask_t numa_mask;
-
- cpumask_copy(&numa_mask, cpumask_of_node(nid));
- irq_set_affinity(irq, &numa_mask);
+ irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of_node(nid));
}
err = request_irq(irq, sparc64_msiq_interrupt, 0,
"MSIQ",
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists