[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2acea3c3-5c8f-4f3c-a275-743c3fbfd2e6@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 18:12:23 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] thermal/debugfs: Fix and clean up trip point
statistics updates
On 22/04/2024 17:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:34 PM Daniel Lezcano
[ ... ]
>> or we should expect at least the residency to be showed even if the
>> mitigation state is not closed ?
>
> Well, in fact the device has already been in that state for some time
> and the mitigation can continue for a while.
Yes, but when to update the residency time ?
When we cross a trip point point ?
or
When we read the information ?
The former is what we are currently doing AFAIR and the latter must add
the delta between the last update and the current time for the current
state, right ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists