[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240422170847.GI9775@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:38:47 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, johan+linaro@...nel.org,
bmasney@...hat.com, djakov@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
vireshk@...nel.org, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com,
quic_skananth@...cinc.com, quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com,
quic_parass@...cinc.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add OPP table support
to PCIe
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:25:06PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>
>
> On 4/22/2024 8:14 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:43:22PM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> > > PCIe needs to choose the appropriate performance state of RPMh power
> >
> > 'PCIe host controller driver'
> >
> > > domain and interconnect bandwidth based up on the PCIe data rate.
> >
> > 'based on the PCIe data rate'
> >
> > >
> > > Add the OPP table support to specify RPMh performance states and
> >
> > 'Hence, add...'
> >
> > > interconnect peak bandwidth.
> > >
> > > Different link configurations may share the same aggregate bandwidth,
> >
> > 'It should be noted that the different...'
> >
> > > e.g., a 2.5 GT/s x2 link and a 5.0 GT/s x1 link have the same bandwidth
> > > and share the same OPP entry.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > index 615296e13c43..9dfe16012726 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> > > @@ -1855,7 +1855,35 @@ &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> > > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > pinctrl-0 = <&pcie0_default_state>;
> > > + operating-points-v2 = <&pcie0_opp_table>;
> > > +
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > +
> > > + pcie0_opp_table: opp-table {
> > > + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> > > +
> > > + /* GEN 1 x1 */
> > > + opp-2500000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2500000>;
> > > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <250000 1>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + /* GEN 2 x1 */
> > > + opp-5000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000000>;
> > > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <500000 1>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + /* GEN 3 x1 */
> > > + opp-8000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <8000000>;
> >
> > I doubt this value. See below...
> >
> > > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <984500 1>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > };
> > > pcie0_phy: phy@...6000 {
> > > @@ -1982,7 +2010,56 @@ &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> > > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_default_state>;
> > > + operating-points-v2 = <&pcie1_opp_table>;
> > > +
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > +
> > > + pcie1_opp_table: opp-table {
> > > + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> > > +
> > > + /* GEN 1 x1 */
> > > + opp-2500000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2500000>;
> > > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <250000 1>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + /* GEN 1 x2 GEN 2 x1 */
> > > + opp-5000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000000>;
> > > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <500000 1>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + /* GEN 2 x2 */
> > > + opp-10000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <10000000>;
> > > + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <1000000 1>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + /* GEN 3 x1 */
> > > + opp-8000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <8000000>;
> >
> > GEN 3 x1 frequency is lower than GEN 2 x2? This looks strange. Both should be of
> > same frequency.
> >
> Gen2 is 5GT/s where as GEN3 is 8GT/s. so the freq for 3 x1(8 x1 GT/s) is
> less than Gen2 x2(5 x2 GT/s)
>
Sorry, that's my bad. I missed the fact that the spec doubled the data rate
starting from GEN 3 only.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists