linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/31] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:35:30 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
 Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
 shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
 D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
 carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
 bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
 baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
 Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
 dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/31] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to
 /fs/resctrl



On 4/22/24 11:01, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu and Dave,
> 
> On 4/22/2024 6:51 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> On 4/19/24 23:06, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1711674410.git.babu.moger@amd.com/
>>
>> Do you have any more feedback on this series. I have few feedbacks from
>> Peter. I was planning to work on v4 of this series.
>>
> 
> Babu: It is difficult to start drilling into the implementation before there
> is agreement on the interface. One reason you went through the effort of
> the first few iterations was to accommodate Arm's use cases as we understand
> it, but we need to hear from Arm if we are on the right track here.
> I do hope that we will hear something in the next couple of weeks. 

Sure. Sounds good.
-- 
Thanks
Babu Moger