[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240422-stoic-sawfly-of-protection-db8bfe@lemur>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:25:18 -0400
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
helpdesk@...nel.org, "workflows@...r.kernel.org" <workflows@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Please create the email alias do-not-apply-to-stable@...nel.org
-> /dev/null
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:49:29PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> @Greg, BTW: should this be stable+noautosel@...nel.org or have a
> 'vger.'
No vger, just stable+whatever@...nel.org.
> in it, e.g. stable+noautosel@...r.kernel.org? I assume without 'vger.'
> is fine, just wanted to be sure, as
> Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst in all other cases
> specifies stable@...r.kernel.org, so people are likely to get confused.
> :-/ #sigh
These serve two different purposes:
stable@...nel.org (goes into devnull)
stable@...r.kernel.org (actual mailing list)
Confusion happens all the time, unfortunately.
Notably, even if someone uses stable+noautosel@...r.kernel.org, it won't
do anything terrible (it won't bounce, it'll just quietly go into
nowhere because that's not a valid expansion command).
-K
Powered by blists - more mailing lists