[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZibE0ORQaDK7RUzU@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:13:04 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the workqueues tree
Hello,
I applied the following patch to wq/for-6.10.
The offending line wasn't introduced recently tho. It goes way back.
5797b1c18919 just touches the surrounding lines. Maybe that triggered
something?
Thanks.
------ 8< ------
>From 51da7f68edae38e81543d57fd71811f7481c0472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:03:13 -1000
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Use "@..." in function comment to describe
variable length argument
Previously, it was using "remaining args" without leading "@" which isn't
valid. Let's follow snprintf()'s example and use "@...".
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 2df1188c0f96..fb3993894536 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ void workqueue_softirq_dead(unsigned int cpu);
* @fmt: printf format for the name of the workqueue
* @flags: WQ_* flags
* @max_active: max in-flight work items, 0 for default
- * remaining args: args for @fmt
+ * @...: args for @fmt
*
* For a per-cpu workqueue, @max_active limits the number of in-flight work
* items for each CPU. e.g. @max_active of 1 indicates that each CPU can be
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists