linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] arch/um: fix forward declaration for vmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:50:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, 
	kent overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, 
	SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, 
	anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, 
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, 
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, 
	linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>, 
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, 
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arch/um: fix forward declaration for vmalloc

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@...gle.com>
>> > It's in mm-unstable under dc26c7e79daf2fc11169b23c150862f0e878ee5a. I
>> > think it just didn't reach Linus' tree yet.
>>
>> Hmm, so we better postpone this path until said commit hits Linus tree,
>> or you carry it together with the commit in mm-unstable.
> 
> Oh, sorry, I didn't realize you were talking about the `Fixes:
> 576477564ede` part... Yeah, unfortunately SHAs in mm-unstable are
> unstable, so the change being fixed is under
> edf0a25633bda1e5b7844478dd13b4326a3d5d09 now. I think Andrew placed
> this fix right after the change it fixes with intention to merge them
> together later on.

Ah, the patch itself goes via Andrew's tree, works for me!
Let me note this in the uml patchwork system.

Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>

Thanks,
//richard