[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UCq9FmhFHfczxGAM+P=foz-XmNvO9r79=3=0SXUYQz8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:15:36 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Cong Yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>, sam@...nborg.org,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, airlied@...il.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xuxinxiong@...qin.corp-partner.google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add himax hx83102
panel bindings
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 8:14 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > +additionalProperties: false
>
> Perhaps 'unevaluatedProperties' instead. Don't you want to support
> standard properties such as width-mm/height-mm?
For at least those two properties, it looks like the answer is "no".
>From reading the Linux driver it appears that physical width/height is
implied by the compatible string. Unless there are other properties we
think we need, maybe it's fine to keep "additionalProperties" ?
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists