[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZiblzgAJ5M38dPh8@akranes.kaiser.cx>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:33:50 +0200
From: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nfs: keep server info for remounts
Thus wrote Jeff Layton (jlayton@...nel.org):
> On Sun, 2024-04-14 at 19:01 +0200, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> > With newer kernels that use fs_context for nfs mounts, remounts fail with
> > -EINVAL.
> > $ mount -t nfs -o nolock 10.0.0.1:/tmp/test /mnt/test/
> > $ mount -t nfs -o remount /mnt/test/
> > mount: mounting 10.0.0.1:/tmp/test on /mnt/test failed: Invalid argument
> > For remounts, the nfs server address and port are populated by
> > nfs_init_fs_context and later overwritten with 0x00 bytes by
> > nfs23_parse_monolithic. The remount then fails as the server address is
> > invalid.
> > Fix this by not overwriting nfs server info in nfs23_parse_monolithic if
> > we're doing a remount.
> > Fixes: f2aedb713c28 ("NFS: Add fs_context support.")
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
> > ---
> >  v3:
> >  - rebased against linux-next from 12th April 2024
> >  v2:
> >  - rebased against linux-next from 26th February 2024
> > Dear all,
> > I'm resending this patch again. The problem that I'm trying to fix is still
> > present in linux-next. Thanks in advance for any reviews and comments.
> > I guess that we're taking this path for remounts
> > do_remount
> >     fs_context_for_reconfigure
> >         alloc_fs_context
> >             init_fs_context == nfs_init_fs_context
> >                fc->root is set for remounts
> >                ctx->nfs_server is populated
> >     parse_monolithic_mount_data
> >         nfs_fs_context_parse_monolithic
> >             nfs23_parse_monolithic
> >                ctx->nfs_server is overwritten with data from mount request
> > An alternative to checking for !is_remount_fc(fc) would be to check
> > if (ctx->nfs_server.addrlen == 0)
> > fs/nfs/fs_context.c | 9 ++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
> > index d0a0956f8a13..cac1157be2c2 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/fs_context.c
> > @@ -1112,9 +1112,12 @@ static int nfs23_parse_monolithic(struct fs_context *fc,
> >  		ctx->acdirmax	= data->acdirmax;
> >  		ctx->need_mount	= false;
> > -		memcpy(sap, &data->addr, sizeof(data->addr));
> > -		ctx->nfs_server.addrlen = sizeof(data->addr);
> > -		ctx->nfs_server.port = ntohs(data->addr.sin_port);
> > +		if (!is_remount_fc(fc)) {
> > +			memcpy(sap, &data->addr, sizeof(data->addr));
> > +			ctx->nfs_server.addrlen = sizeof(data->addr);
> > +			ctx->nfs_server.port = ntohs(data->addr.sin_port);
> > +		}
> > +
> >  		if (sap->ss_family != AF_INET ||
> >  		    !nfs_verify_server_address(sap))
> >  			goto out_no_address;
> Doesn't nfs4_parse_monolithic need the same fix? 
Sorry for the delayed response. It took me a moment to set up a test with nfs4
(busybox mount has no nfs4 support).
The nfs4 remounts do not fail for me. The mount syscall goes into
nfs4_parse_monolithic and 
   if (data->version != 1)                                                                                             
      return generic_parse_monolithic(fc, data);                                                                       
branches off into generic_parse_monolithic before the server address is
overwritten (this is what breaks nfs23).
Best regards,
   Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists