linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] x86/mce: Define mce_setup() helpers for common and per-CPU fields

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240422081350.GBZiYcPme1Xx1RRqhp@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:13:50 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, Avadhut.Naik@....com,
	John.Allen@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] x86/mce: Define mce_setup() helpers for common
 and per-CPU fields

On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:50:58AM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> Should I send another revision of this entire set? Or should I split out
> the mce_setup() patches?

I leave it up to you.

If it makes sense to keep it all together then wait for me to go through
the rest first and send a whole new set or if you want to break this
out, that's fine too.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette