[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5caa45a40659dd772f63d9674bfc915c98efdecc.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:16:02 +0200
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Heiko
Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] watchdog: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies
On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 07:55 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:42:01AM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will disable inb()/outb() and friends at
> > compile time. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for those
> > drivers using them.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > Note: This patch does not depend any not-yet-mainline HAS_IOPORT changes
> > and may be merged via subsystem specific trees at your earliest
> > convenience.
>
> Seems like the COMPILE_TEST / HAS_IOPORT problem is watchdog and
> hwmon specific, so I'll just let it go.
>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>
> Guenter
Thank you. What tree should this go via?
Thanks,
Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists