linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Fix dma_resv deadlock at drm object pin time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6066f6f0-49c6-4607-9c33-88e166ccae86@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 11:17:18 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com>,
 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
 Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
 Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
 Zack Rusin <zack.rusin@...adcom.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Fix dma_resv deadlock at drm object pin
 time

On 4/21/24 19:39, Adrián Larumbe wrote:
> When Panfrost must pin an object that is being prepared a dma-buf
> attachment for on behalf of another driver, the core drm gem object pinning
> code already takes a lock on the object's dma reservation.
> 
> However, Panfrost GEM object's pinning callback would eventually try taking
> the lock on the same dma reservation when delegating pinning of the object
> onto the shmem subsystem, which led to a deadlock.
> 
> This can be shown by enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH, which throws
> the following recursive locking situation:
> 
> weston/3440 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff000000e235a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_gem_shmem_pin+0x34/0xb8 [drm_shmem_helper]
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff000000e235a0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_gem_pin+0x2c/0x80 [drm]
> 
> Fix it by assuming the object's reservation had already been locked by the
> time we reach panfrost_gem_pin.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
> Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> Fixes: a78027847226 ("drm/gem: Acquire reservation lock in drm_gem_{pin/unpin}()")
> Signed-off-by: Adrián Larumbe <adrian.larumbe@...labora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c
> index d47b40b82b0b..6c26652d425d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c
> @@ -192,7 +192,12 @@ static int panfrost_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>  	if (bo->is_heap)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	return drm_gem_shmem_pin(&bo->base);
> +	/*
> +	 * Pinning can only happen in response to a prime attachment request from
> +	 * another driver, but that's already being handled by drm_gem_pin
> +	 */
> +	drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, obj->import_attach);
> +	return drm_gem_shmem_pin_locked(&bo->base);
>  }

Will be better to use drm_gem_shmem_object_pin() to avoid such problem
in future

Please also fix the Lima driver

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry