| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240422114020.0000294f@Huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 11:40:20 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
<x86@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "Rafael J . Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>, "James Morse"
<james.morse@....com>, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, Jean-Philippe
Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>, Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "Dave
Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <justin.he@....com>,
<jianyong.wu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/16] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's
disabled but 'online capable' CPUs
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:54:07 +0100
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
>
> To support virtual CPU hotplug, ACPI has added an 'online capable' bit
> to the MADT GICC entries. This indicates a disabled CPU entry may not
> be possible to online via PSCI until firmware has set enabled bit in
> _STA.
>
> This means that a "usable" GIC is one that is marked as either enabled,
> or online capable. Therefore, change acpi_gicc_is_usable() to check both
> bits. However, we need to change the test in gic_acpi_match_gicc() back
> to testing just the enabled bit so the count of enabled distributors is
> correct.
>
> What about the redistributor in the GICC entry? ACPI doesn't want to say.
> Assume the worst: When a redistributor is described in the GICC entry,
> but the entry is marked as disabled at boot, assume the redistributor
> is inaccessible.
>
> The GICv3 driver doesn't support late online of redistributors, so this
> means the corresponding CPU can't be brought online either. Clear the
> possible and present bits.
>
> Systems that want CPU hotplug in a VM can ensure their redistributors
> are always-on, and describe them that way with a GICR entry in the MADT.
>
> When mapping redistributors found via GICC entries, handle the case
> where the arch code believes the CPU is present and possible, but it
> does not have an accessible redistributor. Print a warning and clear
> the present and possible bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
+CC Marc,
Whilst this has been unchanged for a long time, I'm not 100% sure
we've specifically drawn your attention to it before now.
Jonathan
>
> ---
> v7: No Change.
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/acpi.h | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> index 10af15f93d4d..66132251c1bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> @@ -2363,11 +2363,25 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header;
> u32 reg = readl_relaxed(acpi_data.dist_base + GICD_PIDR2) & GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_MASK;
> u32 size = reg == GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_GICv4 ? SZ_64K * 4 : SZ_64K * 2;
> + int cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(gicc->uid);
> void __iomem *redist_base;
>
> if (!acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc))
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Capable but disabled CPUs can be brought online later. What about
> + * the redistributor? ACPI doesn't want to say!
> + * Virtual hotplug systems can use the MADT's "always-on" GICR entries.
> + * Otherwise, prevent such CPUs from being brought online.
> + */
> + if (!(gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) {
> + pr_warn_once("CPU %u's redistributor is inaccessible: this CPU can't be brought online\n", cpu);
> + set_cpu_present(cpu, false);
> + set_cpu_possible(cpu, false);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> redist_base = ioremap(gicc->gicr_base_address, size);
> if (!redist_base)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -2413,9 +2427,12 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>
> /*
> * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means
> - * GICR base is presented via GICC
> + * GICR base is presented via GICC. The redistributor is only known to
> + * be accessible if the GICC is marked as enabled. If this bit is not
> + * set, we'd need to add the redistributor at runtime, which isn't
> + * supported.
> */
> - if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address)
> + if (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED && gicc->gicr_base_address)
> acpi_data.enabled_rdists++;
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 9844a3f9c4e5..fcfb7bb6789e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -239,7 +239,8 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry (struct acpi_subtable_header *madt);
>
> static inline bool acpi_gicc_is_usable(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc)
> {
> - return gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED;
> + return gicc->flags & (ACPI_MADT_ENABLED |
> + ACPI_MADT_GICC_ONLINE_CAPABLE);
> }
>
> /* the following numa functions are architecture-dependent */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists