[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000000000000758c1c0616aecf58@google.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:45:20 -0700
From: syzbot <syzbot+a4ed4041b9bea8177ac3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
jakub@...udflare.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in __sock_map_delete
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
HEAD commit: ed30a4a51bb1 Linux 6.9-rc5
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15124c3b180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=545d4b3e07d6ccbc
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a4ed4041b9bea8177ac3
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=102d66bf180000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10107f67180000
Downloadable assets:
disk image (non-bootable): https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7bc7510fe41f/non_bootable_disk-ed30a4a5.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c62dd6fbdae1/vmlinux-ed30a4a5.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/2ee0879390c1/bzImage-ed30a4a5.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+a4ed4041b9bea8177ac3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor381/5177 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888027aca200 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff888027aca200 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: __sock_map_delete+0x43/0xe0 net/core/sock_map.c:417
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888027acaa00 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff888027acaa00 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_update_common+0x197/0x870 net/core/sock_map.c:493
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&stab->lock);
lock(&stab->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
5 locks held by syz-executor381/5177:
#0: ffff88802f6ad258 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1671 [inline]
#0: ffff88802f6ad258 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_map_sk_acquire net/core/sock_map.c:117 [inline]
#0: ffff88802f6ad258 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x1b6/0x570 net/core/sock_map.c:578
#1: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: sock_map_sk_acquire net/core/sock_map.c:118 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x1d8/0x570 net/core/sock_map.c:578
#2: ffff888027acaa00 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
#2: ffff888027acaa00 (&stab->lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_update_common+0x197/0x870 net/core/sock_map.c:493
#3: ffff88801a940290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
#3: ffff88801a940290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:145 [inline]
#3: ffff88801a940290 (&psock->link_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_map_unref+0xbf/0x6e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
#4: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 [inline]
#4: ffffffff8d7b0e20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run2+0xe4/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 5177 Comm: syz-executor381 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3062 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3856 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x20e6/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x33/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
__sock_map_delete+0x43/0xe0 net/core/sock_map.c:417
sock_map_delete_elem+0xb5/0x100 net/core/sock_map.c:449
___bpf_prog_run+0x3e51/0xabd0 kernel/bpf/core.c:1997
__bpf_prog_run32+0xc1/0x100 kernel/bpf/core.c:2236
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1234 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:657 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:664 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2381 [inline]
bpf_trace_run2+0x151/0x420 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2420
trace_kfree include/trace/events/kmem.h:94 [inline]
kfree+0x225/0x390 mm/slub.c:4377
sk_psock_free_link include/linux/skmsg.h:421 [inline]
sock_map_del_link net/core/sock_map.c:158 [inline]
sock_map_unref+0x392/0x6e0 net/core/sock_map.c:180
sock_map_update_common+0x4f3/0x870 net/core/sock_map.c:506
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x3bb/0x570 net/core/sock_map.c:582
bpf_map_update_value+0x36c/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:172
map_update_elem+0x623/0x910 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0xab9/0x4b40 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5648
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5767 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x78/0xc0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5765
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x260 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f6bcc5b7729
Code: 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 37 17 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fff751f0718 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fff751f08e8 RCX: 00007f6bcc5b7729
RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000020000680 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: 00007f6bcc62a610 R08: 00007fff751f08e8 R09: 00007fff751f08e8
R10: 00007fff751f08e8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 00007fff751f08d8 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001
</TASK>
---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists