linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bitops: Change function return types from long to int

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <C0856D2E-53FF-45EB-B0F9-D4F836C7222C@toblux.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:30:03 +0200
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...lux.com>
To: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
 Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>,
 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
 Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
 Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
 Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>,
 Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
 Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>,
 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops: Change function return types from long to int

On 22. Apr 2024, at 09:44, Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't mind the idea, but in the past I've send some patches trying to align some arch specific implementations with asm-generic ones. Now you are changing only asm-generic implementation and leaving arch specific ones untouched (that's probably why you see no size change on some of them).

I would submit architecture-specific changes in another patch set to keep it
simple and to be able to review each arch separately.