[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240422144431.GE9775@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:14:31 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, johan+linaro@...nel.org,
bmasney@...hat.com, djakov@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
vireshk@...nel.org, quic_vbadigan@...cinc.com,
quic_skananth@...cinc.com, quic_nitegupt@...cinc.com,
quic_parass@...cinc.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: Add OPP table support
to PCIe
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:43:22PM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> PCIe needs to choose the appropriate performance state of RPMh power
'PCIe host controller driver'
> domain and interconnect bandwidth based up on the PCIe data rate.
'based on the PCIe data rate'
>
> Add the OPP table support to specify RPMh performance states and
'Hence, add...'
> interconnect peak bandwidth.
>
> Different link configurations may share the same aggregate bandwidth,
'It should be noted that the different...'
> e.g., a 2.5 GT/s x2 link and a 5.0 GT/s x1 link have the same bandwidth
> and share the same OPP entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@...cinc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> index 615296e13c43..9dfe16012726 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
> @@ -1855,7 +1855,35 @@ &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&pcie0_default_state>;
>
> + operating-points-v2 = <&pcie0_opp_table>;
> +
> status = "disabled";
> +
> + pcie0_opp_table: opp-table {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> +
> + /* GEN 1 x1 */
> + opp-2500000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2500000>;
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> + opp-peak-kBps = <250000 1>;
> + };
> +
> + /* GEN 2 x1 */
> + opp-5000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000000>;
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> + opp-peak-kBps = <500000 1>;
> + };
> +
> + /* GEN 3 x1 */
> + opp-8000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <8000000>;
I doubt this value. See below...
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> + opp-peak-kBps = <984500 1>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> };
>
> pcie0_phy: phy@...6000 {
> @@ -1982,7 +2010,56 @@ &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1 QCOM_ICC_TAG_ALWAYS>,
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> pinctrl-0 = <&pcie1_default_state>;
>
> + operating-points-v2 = <&pcie1_opp_table>;
> +
> status = "disabled";
> +
> + pcie1_opp_table: opp-table {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> +
> + /* GEN 1 x1 */
> + opp-2500000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <2500000>;
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> + opp-peak-kBps = <250000 1>;
> + };
> +
> + /* GEN 1 x2 GEN 2 x1 */
> + opp-5000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <5000000>;
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> + opp-peak-kBps = <500000 1>;
> + };
> +
> + /* GEN 2 x2 */
> + opp-10000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <10000000>;
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> + opp-peak-kBps = <1000000 1>;
> + };
> +
> + /* GEN 3 x1 */
> + opp-8000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <8000000>;
GEN 3 x1 frequency is lower than GEN 2 x2? This looks strange. Both should be of
same frequency.
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
> + opp-peak-kBps = <984500 1>;
> + };
> +
> + /* GEN 3 x2 GEN 4 x1 */
'GEN 3 x2 and GEN 4 x1'
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists