[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<171379982802.28518.11875355744954376996.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:30:28 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@...nel.org>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
puranjay12@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] arm32, bpf: reimplement sign-extension mov instruction
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:28:32 +0000 you wrote:
> The current implementation of the mov instruction with sign extension
> has the following problems:
>
> 1. It clobbers the source register if it is not stacked because it
> sign extends the source and then moves it to the destination.
> 2. If the dst_reg is stacked, the current code doesn't write the value
> back in case of 64-bit mov.
> 3. There is room for improvement by emitting fewer instructions.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf] arm32, bpf: reimplement sign-extension mov instruction
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/c6f48506ba30
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists