[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef670902-edf0-43a3-9409-e0719514ba68@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:32:21 +0800
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
To: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Huang, Ying"
<ying.huang@...el.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] ceph: drop usage of page_index
On 4/22/24 23:34, Kairui Song wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 9:40 AM Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com> wrote:
>> On 4/18/24 09:30, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 08:28:22AM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
>>>> Thanks for you patch and will it be doable to switch to folio_index()
>>>> instead ?
>>> No. Just use folio->index. You only need folio_index() if the folio
>>> might belong to the swapcache instead of a file.
>>>
>> Hmm, Okay.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> - Xiubo
>>
> Hi Xiubo
>
> Thanks for the comment,
>
> As Matthew mentioned there is no need to use folio_index unless you
> are access swapcache. And I found that ceph is not using folios
> internally yet, needs a lot of conversions. So I think I'll just keep
> using page->index here, later conversions may change it to
> folio->index.
>
Sounds good to me and thanks for explaining.
Cheers
- Xiubo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists