linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate control flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a8238354-c36e-4dcb-88ba-1417adc44245@fiberby.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:31:39 +0000
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>,
 Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@...com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
 linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: flower: validate
 control flags

Hi Jiri,

Thank you for the reviews.

On 4/23/24 12:57 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Next time, could you please bundle similar/related patches into
> a patchset?

Sure, I did it per driver to make it easier to handle differences in
get_maintainer output and be able to integrate feedback into later patches
for other drivers, and since the patches could be applied individually.
When I started I through that more drivers had their own trees, wasn't
aware that it was only Intel, and that mlx5-next was dead.
For instance the feedback from Jianbo on mlx5 patch, also went into the
octeontx2-pf patch.

I only have one patch left in the queue now (for qede).

-- 
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Network Engineer
Fiberby - AS42541