linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 10/12] x86/irq: Extend checks for pending vectors to posted interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240423174114.526704-11-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:41:12 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	X86 Kernel <x86@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@...el.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	maz@...nel.org,
	seanjc@...gle.com,
	"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@....com>,
	jim.harris@...sung.com,
	a.manzanares@...sung.com,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	guang.zeng@...el.com,
	robert.hoo.linux@...il.com,
	oliver.sang@...el.com,
	acme@...nel.org,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3  10/12] x86/irq: Extend checks for pending vectors to posted interrupts

During interrupt affinity change, it is possible to have interrupts delivered
to the old CPU after the affinity has changed to the new one. To prevent lost
interrupts, local APIC IRR is checked on the old CPU. Similar checks must be
done for posted MSIs given the same reason.

Consider the following scenario:
	Device		system agent		iommu		memory 		CPU/LAPIC
1	FEEX_XXXX
2			Interrupt request
3						Fetch IRTE	->
4						->Atomic Swap PID.PIR(vec)
						Push to Global Observable(GO)
5						if (ON*)
							done;*
						else
6							send a notification ->

* ON: outstanding notification, 1 will suppress new notifications

If the affinity change happens between 3 and 5 in IOMMU, the old CPU's posted
interrupt request (PIR) could have pending bit set for the vector being moved.

This patch adds a helper function to check individual vector status.
Then use the helper to check for pending interrupts on the source CPU's
PID.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>

---
v3: Fix a stray letter in the comment, no code change
v2: Fold in helper function patch.
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h        |  3 ++-
 arch/x86/include/asm/posted_intr.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
index 50f9781fa3ed..5644c396713e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <asm/msr.h>
 #include <asm/hardirq.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
+#include <asm/posted_intr.h>
 
 #define ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3	1
 
@@ -508,7 +509,7 @@ static inline bool is_vector_pending(unsigned int vector)
 	if (irr  & (1 << (vector % 32)))
 		return true;
 
-	return false;
+	return pi_pending_this_cpu(vector);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/posted_intr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/posted_intr.h
index 6f84f6739d99..de788b400fba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/posted_intr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/posted_intr.h
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
 #ifndef _X86_POSTED_INTR_H
 #define _X86_POSTED_INTR_H
+#include <asm/irq_vectors.h>
 
 #define POSTED_INTR_ON  0
 #define POSTED_INTR_SN  1
@@ -92,8 +93,25 @@ static inline void __pi_clear_sn(struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_POSTED_MSI
+/*
+ * Not all external vectors are subject to interrupt remapping, e.g. IOMMU's
+ * own interrupts. Here we do not distinguish them since those vector bits in
+ * PIR will always be zero.
+ */
+static inline bool pi_pending_this_cpu(unsigned int vector)
+{
+	struct pi_desc *pid = this_cpu_ptr(&posted_msi_pi_desc);
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vector > NR_VECTORS || vector < FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR))
+		return false;
+
+	return test_bit(vector, (unsigned long *)pid->pir);
+}
+
 extern void intel_posted_msi_init(void);
 #else
+static inline bool pi_pending_this_cpu(unsigned int vector) { return false; }
+
 static inline void intel_posted_msi_init(void) {};
 #endif /* X86_POSTED_MSI */
 
-- 
2.25.1