linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/16] thermal: core: Introduce .trip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3c169af3-e9c3-47c0-b343-48f699680009@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:58:37 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
 Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/16] thermal: core: Introduce .trip_crossed()
 callback for thermal governors

On 23/04/2024 19:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:14 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/04/2024 18:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>>
>>> Introduce a new thermal governor callback called .trip_crossed()
>>> that will be invoked whenever a trip point is crossed by the zone
>>> temperature, either on the way up or on the way down.
>>>
>>> The trip crossing direction information will be passed to it and if
>>> multiple trips are crossed in the same direction during one thermal zone
>>> update, the new callback will be invoked for them in temperature order,
>>> either ascending or descending, depending on the trip crossing
>>> direction.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>>> ---

[ ... ]

>>> +             if (governor->trip_crossed)
>>> +                     governor->trip_crossed(tz, &td->trip, true);
>>
>> Is it possible to wrap this into a function ? So we keep the calls at
>> the same level in this block
> 
> I can send a separate patch for this if you want me to.

Yes, sure


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog