[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZigBepQBSfqLsyL7@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:44:10 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Eric Chanudet <echanude@...hat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/15] mm: jit/text allocator
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:44:21PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>
> (something went wrong with the prevois posting, sorry for the noise)
>
> Hi,
>
> Since v3 I looked into making execmem more of an utility toolbox, as we
> discussed at LPC with Mark Rutland, but it was getting more hairier than
> having a struct describing architecture constraints and a type identifying
> the consumer of execmem.
>
> And I do think that having the description of architecture constraints for
> allocations of executable memory in a single place is better than having it
> spread all over the place.
>
> The patches available via git:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=execmem/v5
Thanks! I've merged and pushed this onto modules-next in its entirety now for
wider testing.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists