[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240423024439.1064922-1-xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:44:39 +0000
From: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
To: <longman@...hat.com>, <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, <tj@...nel.org>,
<hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 -next] cgroup/cpuset: Avoid clearing CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE twice
In cpuset_css_online(), CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE will be cleared twice,
the former one in the is_in_v2_mode() case could be removed because
is_in_v2_mode() can be true for cgroup v1 if the "cpuset_v2_mode"
mount option is specified, that balance flag change isn't appropriate
for this particular case.
Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
---
v2: remove the one in is_in_v2_mode() case.
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index d8d3439eda4e..bb9bf25889c9 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -4051,11 +4051,6 @@ static int cpuset_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
cs->effective_mems = parent->effective_mems;
cs->use_parent_ecpus = true;
parent->child_ecpus_count++;
- /*
- * Clear CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE if parent is isolated
- */
- if (!is_sched_load_balance(parent))
- clear_bit(CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE, &cs->flags);
}
/*
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists