[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240424022822.GAZihuRjwlK6kOF0ya@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 04:29:01 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org, Avadhut.Naik@....com,
John.Allen@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/16] x86/mce/amd: Clean up SMCA configuration
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 03:32:00PM -0400, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> This is not the same.
>
> "CFG_DFR_INT_TYPE" is a register field.
>
> "INTR_TYPE_APIC" is a value. And this same value can be used in other register
> fields.
I don't care - this was just an example of how it should look like. Like
the rest of the code around the kernel and not like an obfuscated
C contest mess.
> I think it's fair to just use logical AND for single bit checks instead of the
> FIELD_GET() macro.
>
> But the FIELD_PREP() macro does help for setting bitfields. I think it's
> clearer than manually doing the proper shifts and masks.
To you maybe.
Pls stick to how common code does masks generation and manipulation so
that this remains readable. This FIELD* crap is not helping.
> Okay. I was thinking to keep the names shorter since they are only used in
> this file. But I'll change them.
If you want to keep them shorter, then think of an overall shorter
scheme of how the register *and* the fields which belong to it, should
be named. But there's a point in having the same prefix for register and
bits which belong to it.
> Okay. I'll include the follow up patches in the next revision of this set.
Pls do.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists