[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd4072dc-7cd3-4d13-a15b-d63c675a5994@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:13:26 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Niko Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos@...ize.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: James Cowgill <james.cowgill@...ize.com>,
Matt Redfearn <matthew.redfearn@...ize.com>,
Neil Jones <neil.jones@...ize.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: clock: Add binding constants for
BLZP1600
On 24/04/2024 15:32, Niko Pasaloukos wrote:
> Add SCMI clock numbers according to the Blaize BLZP1600
> SoC hardware specifications.
>
> Reviewed-by: James Cowgill <james.cowgill@...ize.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...ize.com>
> Reviewed-by: Neil Jones <neil.jones@...ize.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos@...ize.com>
This goes to the patch introducing binding doc.
> ---
> .../dt-bindings/clock/blaize,blzp1600-clk.h | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/blaize,blzp1600-clk.h
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/blaize,blzp1600-clk.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/blaize,blzp1600-clk.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f1d59849a6e5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/blaize,blzp1600-clk.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2023, Blaize, Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef DT_BINDING_CLK_BLZP1600_H
> +#define DT_BINDING_CLK_BLZP1600_H
> +
> +/* ARM SCMI clocks */
> +
> +/* BLZP1600 clock-gate numbers as defined in the hardware architecture */
> +
> +#define BLZP1600_CPU_CLK 0
> +/* clock-gates 1-6 invalid */
No, they cannot be invalid. IDs start from 0 and are incremented by one.
If you have holes, it is not a binding.
Drop the header or use it properly, so as virtual IDs.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists