[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab18a4b1-bcbf-4417-b43a-5feae3b5ba66@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:00:01 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: 21cnbao@...il.com, ryan.roberts@....com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: introduce per-order mTHP split counters
On 24.04.24 15:51, Lance Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At present, the split counters in THP statistics no longer include
> PTE-mapped mTHP. Therefore, we want to introduce per-order mTHP split
> counters to monitor the frequency of mTHP splits. This will assist
> developers in better analyzing and optimizing system performance.
>
> /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepages-<size>/stats
> split_page
> split_page_failed
> deferred_split_page
>
> Thanks,
> Lance
> ---
>
> Lance Yang (2):
> mm: add per-order mTHP split counters
> mm: add docs for per-order mTHP split counters
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst | 16 ----------------
We really have to start documenting these, and what the sementics are.
E.g., is split_page_failed contained in split_page? Is
deferred_split_page contained in split_page?
But also: just don't call it "split_page". Drop the "_page".
split
split_failed
split_deferred
?
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists