[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240424154846.2152750-3-rrichter@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:48:41 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>
CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, Robert Richter
<rrichter@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Len Brown
<lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/7] x86/numa: Remove numa_fill_memblks() from sparsemem.h using __weak
>From Dan:
It just feels like numa_fill_memblks() has absolutely no business being
defined in arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h.
The only use for numa_fill_memblks() is to arrange for NUMA nodes to be
applied to memory ranges hot-onlined by the CXL driver.
It belongs right next to numa_add_memblk(), and I suspect
arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h was only chosen to avoid figuring out
what to do about the fact that linux/numa.h does not include asm/numa.h
and that all implementations either provide numa_add_memblk() or select
the generic implementation.
So I would prefer that this do the proper fix and get
numa_fill_memblks() completely out of the sparsemem.h path.
Something like the following which boots for me.
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/66271b0072317_69102944c@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
---
Authorship can be changed to Dan's if he wants to but that needs his
Signed-off-by.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 2 --
drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 5 +++++
include/linux/numa.h | 7 -------
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
index ef2844d69173..12a93a3466c4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ extern s16 __apicid_to_node[MAX_LOCAL_APIC];
extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
extern int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
+extern int __init numa_fill_memblks(u64 start, u64 end);
extern void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
static inline void set_apicid_to_node(int apicid, s16 node)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h
index 1aaa447ef24b..64df897c0ee3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h
@@ -38,8 +38,6 @@ extern int phys_to_target_node(phys_addr_t start);
extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
#define memory_add_physaddr_to_nid memory_add_physaddr_to_nid
#endif
-extern int numa_fill_memblks(u64 start, u64 end);
-#define numa_fill_memblks numa_fill_memblks
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_SPARSEMEM_H */
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
index e45e64993c50..3b09fd39eeb4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
@@ -208,6 +208,11 @@ int __init srat_disabled(void)
return acpi_numa < 0;
}
+__weak int __init numa_fill_memblks(u64 start, u64 end)
+{
+ return NUMA_NO_MEMBLK;
+}
+
#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
/*
* Callback for SLIT parsing. pxm_to_node() returns NUMA_NO_NODE for
diff --git a/include/linux/numa.h b/include/linux/numa.h
index 915033a75731..8485d98e554d 100644
--- a/include/linux/numa.h
+++ b/include/linux/numa.h
@@ -36,13 +36,6 @@ int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
int phys_to_target_node(u64 start);
#endif
-#ifndef numa_fill_memblks
-static inline int __init numa_fill_memblks(u64 start, u64 end)
-{
- return NUMA_NO_MEMBLK;
-}
-#endif
-
#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
static inline int numa_nearest_node(int node, unsigned int state)
{
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists