[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed01ddf04bfb475596b24b634fd26cffaa85173a.1713974291.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:57:59 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, <svsm-devel@...onut-svsm.dev>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, "Peter
Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>, Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/15] x86/sev: Make the VMPL0 checking more straight forward
Currently, the enforce_vmpl0() function uses a set argument when modifying
the VMPL1 permissions used to test for VMPL0. If the guest is not running
at VMPL0, the guest self-terminates.
The function is just a wrapper for a fixed RMPADJUST function. Eliminate
the function and perform the RMPADJUST directly.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
---
arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c | 35 ++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
index 5ad0ff4664f1..0457a9d7e515 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
@@ -335,26 +335,6 @@ void do_boot_stage2_vc(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long exit_code)
sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_GEN, GHCB_SEV_ES_GEN_REQ);
}
-static void enforce_vmpl0(void)
-{
- u64 attrs;
- int err;
-
- /*
- * RMPADJUST modifies RMP permissions of a lesser-privileged (numerically
- * higher) privilege level. Here, clear the VMPL1 permission mask of the
- * GHCB page. If the guest is not running at VMPL0, this will fail.
- *
- * If the guest is running at VMPL0, it will succeed. Even if that operation
- * modifies permission bits, it is still ok to do so currently because Linux
- * SNP guests are supported only on VMPL0 so VMPL1 or higher permission masks
- * changing is a don't-care.
- */
- attrs = 1;
- if (rmpadjust((unsigned long)&boot_ghcb_page, RMP_PG_SIZE_4K, attrs))
- sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_LINUX, GHCB_TERM_NOT_VMPL0);
-}
-
/*
* SNP_FEATURES_IMPL_REQ is the mask of SNP features that will need
* guest side implementation for proper functioning of the guest. If any
@@ -588,7 +568,20 @@ void sev_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
if (!(get_hv_features() & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP))
sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_GEN, GHCB_SNP_UNSUPPORTED);
- enforce_vmpl0();
+ /*
+ * Enforce running at VMPL0.
+ *
+ * RMPADJUST modifies RMP permissions of a lesser-privileged (numerically
+ * higher) privilege level. Here, clear the VMPL1 permission mask of the
+ * GHCB page. If the guest is not running at VMPL0, this will fail.
+ *
+ * If the guest is running at VMPL0, it will succeed. Even if that operation
+ * modifies permission bits, it is still ok to do so currently because Linux
+ * SNP guests running at VMPL0 only run at VMPL0, so VMPL1 or higher
+ * permission mask changes are a don't-care.
+ */
+ if (rmpadjust((unsigned long)&boot_ghcb_page, RMP_PG_SIZE_4K, 1))
+ sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_LINUX, GHCB_TERM_NOT_VMPL0);
}
if (snp && !(sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED))
--
2.43.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists