[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjy_ph9URuFt-pq+2AJ__p7gFDx=yzVSCsx16xAYvNw9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:53:36 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kenny Levinsen <kl@...wtf>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: regression fixes sitting in subsystem git trees for a week or
longer (was: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: i2c-hid: Revert to await reset ACK before
reading report descriptor)
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 09:56, Thorsten Leemhuis
<regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
>
> out of interest: what's your stance on regression fixes sitting in
> subsystem git trees for a week or longer before being mainlined?
Annoying, but probably depends on circumstances. The fact that it took
a while to even be noticed presumably means it's not common or holding
anything up.
That said, th4e last HID pull I have is from March 14. If the issue is
just that there's nothing else happening, I think people should just
point me to the patch and say "can you apply this single fix?"
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists