[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <171398904724.10875.2678089770204346248.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 20:04:07 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Dawei Li" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maz@...nel.org
Subject: [tip: irq/core] irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1: Avoid explicit cpumask
allocation on stack
The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 6a9a52f74e3b82ff3f5398810c1b23ad497e2df5
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/6a9a52f74e3b82ff3f5398810c1b23ad497e2df5
Author: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
AuthorDate: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:54:49 +08:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:23:49 +02:00
irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1: Avoid explicit cpumask allocation on stack
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_first_and_and() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@...ngroup.cn>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240416085454.3547175-3-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
index eb02d20..90daa27 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
@@ -192,14 +192,10 @@ static int bcm6345_l1_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
u32 mask = BIT(d->hwirq % IRQS_PER_WORD);
unsigned int old_cpu = cpu_for_irq(intc, d);
unsigned int new_cpu;
- struct cpumask valid;
unsigned long flags;
bool enabled;
- if (!cpumask_and(&valid, &intc->cpumask, dest))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- new_cpu = cpumask_any_and(&valid, cpu_online_mask);
+ new_cpu = cpumask_first_and_and(&intc->cpumask, dest, cpu_online_mask);
if (new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
return -EINVAL;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists