lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46925bcd-ad92-4c02-90f3-11da5c627391@ghiti.fr>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:26:35 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
 Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
 Cyril Jean <cyril.jean@...rochip.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] firmware: microchip: don't unconditionally print
 validation success

Hi Conor,

On 10/04/2024 13:58, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> If validation fails, both prints are made. Skip the success one in the
> failure case.
>
> Fixes: ec5b0f1193ad ("firmware: microchip: add PolarFire SoC Auto Update support")
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
>   drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c b/drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c
> index 33343e83373c..298ad21e139b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c
> @@ -218,10 +218,12 @@ static int mpfs_auto_update_verify_image(struct fw_upload *fw_uploader)
>   	if (ret | response->resp_status) {
>   		dev_warn(priv->dev, "Verification of Upgrade Image failed!\n");
>   		ret = ret ? ret : -EBADMSG;
> +		goto free_message;
>   	}
>   
>   	dev_info(priv->dev, "Verification of Upgrade Image passed!\n");
>   
> +free_message:
>   	devm_kfree(priv->dev, message);
>   free_response:
>   	devm_kfree(priv->dev, response);


This should go into -fixes, but not sure if you take care of this or if 
Palmer should, please let me know so that I can remove this from my list :)

Thanks,

Alex


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ