linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] firmware: microchip: don't unconditionally print validation success

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240424-overthrow-punch-75d29c804296@spud>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:04:02 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
	Cyril Jean <cyril.jean@...rochip.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] firmware: microchip: don't unconditionally print
 validation success

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 09:59:36PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:26:35PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > Hi Conor,
> > 
> > On 10/04/2024 13:58, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > > 
> > > If validation fails, both prints are made. Skip the success one in the
> > > failure case.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: ec5b0f1193ad ("firmware: microchip: add PolarFire SoC Auto Update support")
> > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c | 2 ++
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c b/drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c
> > > index 33343e83373c..298ad21e139b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/microchip/mpfs-auto-update.c
> > > @@ -218,10 +218,12 @@ static int mpfs_auto_update_verify_image(struct fw_upload *fw_uploader)
> > >   	if (ret | response->resp_status) {
> > >   		dev_warn(priv->dev, "Verification of Upgrade Image failed!\n");
> > >   		ret = ret ? ret : -EBADMSG;
> > > +		goto free_message;
> > >   	}
> > >   	dev_info(priv->dev, "Verification of Upgrade Image passed!\n");
> > > +free_message:
> > >   	devm_kfree(priv->dev, message);
> > >   free_response:
> > >   	devm_kfree(priv->dev, response);
> > 
> > 
> > This should go into -fixes, but not sure if you take care of this or if
> > Palmer should, please let me know so that I can remove this from my list :)
> 
> 
> Yea, probably this and "firmware: microchip: clarify that sizes and
> addresses are in hex" should go on fixes. FYI, I usually set the
> delegate on patchwork for things that I take to me, so generally you
> should be able to tell from that.

I picked up 2 and 3. I'll send a PR with them later in the week, thanks
for the reminder. Patches like these I kinda dislike applying without a
review, but don't really get reviewed unless I harass someone at work to
do so, which I did not do here.

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)