linux-kernel - Re: ynl: maybe minor bug?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240424164312.50c4ed2b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:43:12 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: ynl: maybe minor bug?

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:19:49 -0700 Joe Damato wrote:
> I'm not sure whether:
> 
> 1. tools/net/ynl/lib/ynl.py should be raising NlError when there is an
>    extack in this case (I think this is probably the way to go?), or
> 
> 2. the tests should be changed so that they don't expect an exception to be
>    raised but (ideally?) hide the warning report from tools/net/ynl/lib/ynl.py
>    when the warning is expected.
> 
> I don't know python at all so this is definitely wrong, but here's a small
> change I made to fix the test (a similar change was made for the test which
> follows).

Sorry about this, we pushed the related fix to the net tree, to get it
to Linus sooner:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/commit/?id=a44f2eb106a46f2275a79de54ce0ea63e4f3d8c8

You can cherry-pick that locally, perhaps. net will get merged into
net-next tomorrow, I should have waited before extending the test :(