lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:43:12 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: ynl: maybe minor bug?

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:19:49 -0700 Joe Damato wrote:
> I'm not sure whether:
> 
> 1. tools/net/ynl/lib/ynl.py should be raising NlError when there is an
>    extack in this case (I think this is probably the way to go?), or
> 
> 2. the tests should be changed so that they don't expect an exception to be
>    raised but (ideally?) hide the warning report from tools/net/ynl/lib/ynl.py
>    when the warning is expected.
> 
> I don't know python at all so this is definitely wrong, but here's a small
> change I made to fix the test (a similar change was made for the test which
> follows).

Sorry about this, we pushed the related fix to the net tree, to get it
to Linus sooner:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/commit/?id=a44f2eb106a46f2275a79de54ce0ea63e4f3d8c8

You can cherry-pick that locally, perhaps. net will get merged into
net-next tomorrow, I should have waited before extending the test :(

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ