linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] cgroup/cpuset: Statically initialize more members of top

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a94e7b2f-0c22-f9bd-236c-d542958b6934@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 08:56:47 +0800
From: xiujianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
To: Klara Modin <klarasmodin@...il.com>, <longman@...hat.com>,
	<lizefan.x@...edance.com>, <tj@...nel.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] cgroup/cpuset: Statically initialize more members
 of top_cpuset



On 2024/4/24 3:21, Klara Modin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2024-04-20 11:46, Xiu Jianfeng wrote:
>> Initializing top_cpuset.relax_domain_level and setting
>> CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE to top_cpuset.flags in cpuset_init() could be
>> completed at the time of top_cpuset definition by compiler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 5 ++---
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> index d8d3439eda4e..e70008a1d86a 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
>> @@ -369,8 +369,9 @@ static inline void notify_partition_change(struct
>> cpuset *cs, int old_prs)
>>     static struct cpuset top_cpuset = {
>>       .flags = ((1 << CS_ONLINE) | (1 << CS_CPU_EXCLUSIVE) |
>> -          (1 << CS_MEM_EXCLUSIVE)),
>> +          (1 << CS_MEM_EXCLUSIVE) | (1 < CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE)),
> 
> You dropped a '<' for the bitwise shift, this causes bad cpu utilization
> for me.

Oops, that's bad, I'm sorry for that!

> 
>>       .partition_root_state = PRS_ROOT,
>> +    .relax_domain_level = -1,
>>       .remote_sibling = LIST_HEAD_INIT(top_cpuset.remote_sibling),
>>   };
>>   @@ -4309,8 +4310,6 @@ int __init cpuset_init(void)
>>       nodes_setall(top_cpuset.effective_mems);
>>         fmeter_init(&top_cpuset.fmeter);
>> -    set_bit(CS_SCHED_LOAD_BALANCE, &top_cpuset.flags);
>> -    top_cpuset.relax_domain_level = -1;
>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&remote_children);
>>         BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_attach, GFP_KERNEL));
> 
> Kind regards,
> Klara Modin