| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 08:06:34 +0200
From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
chris.lu@...iatek.com, deren.wu@...iatek.com,
Peter Tsao <peter.tsao@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
linux-mediatek <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: BT_RAM_CODE_MT7961_1a_2_hdr.bin is missing in the firmware tree
On 23.04.24 12:23, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
>
> Could you please push this firmware ASAP?
>
> It's been reported to be missing:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218757
FWIW, that can't be the only solution for that problem, as
Documentation/driver-api/firmware/firmware-usage-guidelines.rst clearly
states:
"""
Users switching to a newer kernel should *not* have to install newer
firmware files to keep their hardware working.
"""
Could anyone from mediatek please confirm that this rule is adhered?
Side note: I wonder if Peter's patch
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240415141922.25055-1-peter.tsao@mediatek.com/
("Bluetooth: btusb: Fix the patch for MT7920 the affected to MT7921") is
relevant for this.
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists