linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 09/16] thermal: gov_step_wise: Use trip thresholds instead of trip temperatures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:03:58 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
 Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/16] thermal: gov_step_wise: Use trip thresholds
 instead of trip temperatures

On 10/04/2024 18:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> In principle, the Step-Wise governor should take trip hystereses into
> account.  After all, once a trip has been crossed on the way up,
> mitigation is still needed until it is crossed on the way down.
> 
> For this reason, make it use trip thresholds that are computed by
> the core when trips are crossed, so as to apply mitigations in the
> hysteresis rages of trips that were crossed on the way up, but have
> not been crossed on the way down yet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog