lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C8F76484-1359-437B-85BF-C646A21F7BCE@holtmann.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:11:10 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: David Lin <yu-hao.lin@....com>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
 "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
 "francesco@...cini.it" <francesco@...cini.it>,
 Pete Hsieh <tsung-hsien.hsieh@....com>,
 "rafael.beims" <rafael.beims@...adex.com>,
 Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v10 0/2] wifi: mwifiex: add code to support host
 mlme

Hi David,

> Johannes agreed that cfg80211 is the correct way for the development of mwifiex
> (mac80211 can't offload association process to driver/FW).

that was never my question here.

> This patch is used to fully leverage SME of wpa_supplicant and hostapd which can complete the missing WPA3 feature of mwifiex.
> The patch series had been reviewed and discussed. It looks like there is no more comments for patch v10.
> I wonder can patch v10 be accepted by you?

If your hardware is a FullMac hardware then what is the point in now separating
auth/assoc out. Is this done just for WPA3 or also for WPA2/WPA1. Are you no
longer a FullMac hardware?

You keep saying that you just want to support WPA3 and if previously the HW
worked as FullMac hardware, then external_auth should be the way to go for
having SAE handled by wpa_supplicant (or iwd for that matter).

Now if you are fully embracing to auth/assoc and we can remove the support
for the connect ops, then lets do it. However I don’t see anything properly
described in the commit message. You keep saying WPA3 support and nothing
else explain what the new Key V2 API of the firmware would do.

Regards

Marcel


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ