[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zijms8ikH7XiWgEx@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:02:11 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Shivansh Vij <shivanshvij@...look.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] arm64/mm: uffd write-protect and soft-dirty
tracking
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:39:23AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> - Have a chat with Catalin about appetite for soft-dirty on arm64; But likely
> that will be left here until/unless there is clear justificaiton that the
> use case cannot be met with uffd-wp.
I agree, I wouldn't use the last software bit if there's a way for CRIU
to eventually use uffd-wp.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists