[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8cb7f43e-0ee9-423d-ad27-93b3c69809f5@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:06:26 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@...wei.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
<nathan@...nel.org>, <nicolas@...sle.eu>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<jpoimboe@...nel.org>, <leitao@...ian.org>, <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
<richard.weiyang@...il.com>, <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
<ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: enable HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
From: Yuntao Liu <liuyuntao12@...wei.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:05:56 +0000
> The current x86 architecture does not yet support the
> HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION feature. x86 is widely used in
> embedded scenarios, and enabling this feature would be beneficial for
> reducing the size of the kernel image.
>
> In order to make this work, we keep the necessary tables by annotating
> them with KEEP, also it requires further changes to linker script to KEEP
> some tables and wildcard compiler generated sections into the right place.
>
> Enabling CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC or CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE will enable
> the objtool's --orc and --retpoline parameters, which will alter the
> layout of the binary file, thereby preventing gc-sections from functioning
> properly. Therefore, HAVE_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION should only be
> selected when they are not enabled.
Dunno, I have DCE enabled for years on my home kernel, see commit [0]
with both ORC and retpolines enabled, and I didn't have any issues.
vmlinux still shrinks well, even with Clang LTO.
>
> Enabling CONFIG_LTO_CLANG or CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT will use vmlinux.o
> instead of performing the slow LTO link again. This can also prevent
> gc-sections from functioning properly. Therefore, using this optimization
> when CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is not enabled.
>
> The size comparison of zImage is as follows:
> x86_def_defconfig i386_defconfig tinyconfig
> 10892288 10826240 607232 no dce
> 10748928 10719744 529408 dce
> 1.3% 0.98% 12.8% shrink
>
> When using smaller config file, there is a significant reduction in the
> size of the zImage.
[0] https://github.com/solbjorn/linux/commit/25c4953ea73d
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists