linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] interconnect: icc-clk: Allow user to specify master/slave ids

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <024c4c07-18df-4cab-97e5-30969d189aa8@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:21:38 +0300
From: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, quic_anusha@...cinc.com,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] interconnect: icc-clk: Allow user to specify
 master/slave ids

On 25.04.24 13:28, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 01:00:48AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/18/24 11:23, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>> Presently, icc-clk driver autogenerates the master and slave ids.
>>> However, devices with multiple nodes on the interconnect could
>>> have other constraints and may not match with the auto generated
>>> node ids. Hence, allow the driver to provide the preferred master
>>> and slave ids.
>>>
>>> Also, update clk-cbf-8996 accordingly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> v9: squash cbf-msm8996 change into this
>>> v8: Per review feedback, set master/slave ids explicitly. Dont autogenerate
>>>       https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/f1b0d280-6986-4055-a611-2caceb15867d@linaro.org/
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c  | 7 ++++++-
>>>    drivers/interconnect/icc-clk.c   | 6 +++---
>>>    include/linux/interconnect-clk.h | 2 ++
>>
>> How is this going to be merged? :/
>>
>> icc-next? clk-next?
> 

Merging all patches via Bjorn's clk-qcom tree seems to be the best option, if he agrees of course.

Thanks,
Georgi

> Bjorn,
> 
> Can you help answer this.
> 
> Thanks
> Varada